Comparison
Sideline vs. your inbox
Not a software competitor, the incumbent. Most agencies don't switch to Sideline from another tool. They switch from this.
In defense of email
It's universal, it needs zero onboarding, and your clients genuinely love it. Every request tool that pretends email doesn't exist gets quietly routed around within a month. Email is a great front door, the problems start when it's also the filing cabinet, the task list, and the archive.
Sideline keeps the door, replaces the cabinet
Clients can keep emailing, their messages become tracked requests with an owner, a status, and a due date. The work leaves the inbox; nobody has to change how they ask for things. That's the whole trick.
| Feature | Sideline | your inbox |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $49/mo flat, whole team | "Free", plus the hours you spend digging through it |
| Where requests arrive | Intake form or email, both land in one queue | Inbox, Slack, texts, a hallway conversation |
| What a request includes | Brief, files, deadline, priority, the form asks up front | Whatever fit in the first message; the rest takes four replies |
| Status | New → In progress → Ready, visible to everyone | Bold means unread. That's the whole system |
| Who's on it | One assignee, visible workload | Whoever replied last (or nobody, see: dropped balls) |
| Client visibility | Portal, they check status without asking you | "Just circling back on this!" ×∞ |
| Files | Attached to the request, forever findable | In the thread from March. One of the threads from March |
| Team-only discussion | Internal notes, locked and unmistakable | Forwarding, side threads, and the occasional reply-all disaster |
| Time tracking & reports | Built in, per request and per client | Friday-afternoon archaeology in a spreadsheet |
| Works everywhere, zero training | Magic-link portal, close, but it is a login | Yes. Genuinely. It's email |
| Hide your client list & team roster from staff | Agency setting per page: client list, team roster, reports. Client list hidden by default | Everyone on a thread sees every address on it |
| Queue ranks itself, with reasons | Smart Focus ranks each person's queue and says why in plain language | Bold means unread |
| AI suggests field updates from the thread | Suggests status, due date, and priority from the conversation; you accept or ignore | No fields to update |
| Client-set priority order | Drag in the list or on the board; the order is shared, so clients can set your priorities | Whatever order your inbox decides |
No pricing page to cite for this one, just every agency's sent folder.
Our honest take
Email isn't the enemy. Untracked work is. The inbox fails agencies in one specific way: it stores conversations, not commitments. Nothing has an owner, a deadline, or a status, so your team re-reads threads to reconstruct what's promised, and clients ping you because silence looks the same whether work is happening or not.
The fix isn't banning email, your clients would ignore that policy anyway, and they'd be right to. The fix is letting email be the doorway while something structured stands behind it. Client emails become requests; your team works the queue; clients watch progress in the portal instead of your inbox.
If your agency runs fine on email, keep the $49. If you recognized more than three rows of that table, you already know.
Keep reading
Your inbox deserves a demotion
Keep email as the front door. We'll take it from there, free migration included.
Start free